This week, ESPN.com’s Ashley Fox wrote an article about Amy Trask, the former Oakland Raiders CEO. (“The Raiders?” you ask me in disgust. I know, I know, but bear with me.)
After 16 years running the team’s non-football related activities, Trask quietly resigned this month. She was the highest-ranking female executive of an NFL team, as well as the only woman to be CEO of an NFL franchise. The article went on to address the role of women (or lack thereof) in the NFL.
What I found interesting was the role Pittsburgh Steelers coach Mike Tomlin played in sparking this discussion. Earlier this month, Tomlin spoke at the National Football League’s career development symposium at the University of Pennsylvania. Throughout the course of the symposium, the issue of minority hiring was discussed.
Yes, the Rooney Rule. Established in 2003, the Rooney Rule’s purpose was to bring racial diversity in head coaching and senior football operation jobs in the NFL by requiring teams to interview minority candidates.
Within the context of the lack of high-ranking women in the NFL, the Rooney Rule provides an interesting precedent, especially after what happened at the beginning of last season.
If you recall, the league was under intense scrutiny in 2012 because of its eight available coaching and seven available general manager jobs, none of the positions went to a minority candidate. But again, the rule requires the teams to interview minority candidates, not necessarily hire them.
So now, I ask what my fellow Steelers fans think of it.
Given the history and precedent that the Rooney Rule (and the Steelers franchise in general) has set for minority candidates in the NFL, do you think there needs to be a similar rule for interviewing women, perhaps named the “Trask Rule?”
Is the lack of women a problem at all? If so, would such a rule solve the problem?