Dec 15, 2013; Pittsburgh, PA, USA; A Pittsburgh Steelers fan cheers against the Cincinnati Bengals during the second half at Heinz Field. The Steelers won 30-20. Mandatory Credit: Jason Bridge-USA TODAY Sports

Pittsburgh Steelers See Local TV Ratings Drop For Third Straight Year


Football is undoubtedly still No. 1 in Pittsburgh, but even hardcore fans have their limits.

According to the Sports Business Journal, the Pittsburgh Steelers saw their local television ratings drop in 2013, the third consecutive year they’ve trended negatively in that category.

Not surprisingly, the ratings decline coincides with the Steelers’ stumble from a Super Bowl berth in 2010-11 to back-to-back 8-8 seasons. Pittsburgh’s 38.2 local rating in 2013 was still the eighth-best in the 32-team NFL, but it’s fallen off more than seven points in three years.

In 2010, the Steelers’ 45.6 rating – which indicates the percentage of TVs in the market tuned to the game – was No. 3 in the league. This year, New Orleans led the NFL in market share for the second time in three seasons, garnering a 52.0 average rating, or nearly 10 points better than runner-up Denver (43.5).

For a frame of reference, the Raiders have pulled up the rear for three straight seasons. Just 10.9 percent of TVs in the Oakland market checked out the silver and black in 2013, although the success of the adjacent 49ers probably leveled a chilling effect on the Bay Area’s other team.

On the bright side for the Steelers, they’ve maintained a top-third level of popularity despite a two-year downturn. Nevertheless, another year out of the playoffs – or another terrible start like 2013′s – would likely drop the local rating again.

Pittsburgh remains one of the most loyal NFL cities, but winning’s more fun to watch than losing. Even though the diehards will always be there, casual fans will find other entertainment options if the Steelers aren’t contending for a seventh NFL title.


Dick's Sporting Goods presents "Hell Week":

Tags: Pittsburgh Steelers TV Ratings

  • Rehab

    If the Chiefs would of made that field goal, you would of seen a complete turn around.

    • Matt Gajtka

      It’s “would’ve”, not “would of.” But yes, I agree.